Publications
Take a look

by John Charles Waterton

Magn Reson Mater Phy (2021). doi: 10.1007/s10334-021-00928-x

Abstract

Objective: To determine the variability, and preferred values, for normal liver longitudinal water proton relaxation rate R₁ in the published literature.

Methods: Values of mean R₁ and between-subject variance were obtained from literature searching. Weighted means were fitted to a heuristic and to a model.

Results: After exclusions, 116 publications (143 studies) remained, representing apparently normal liver in 3392 humans, 99 mice and 249 rats. Seventeen field strengths were included between 0.04 T and 9.4 T. Older studies tended to report higher between-subject coefficients of variation (CoV), but for studies published since 1992, the median between-subject CoV was 7.4%, and in half of those studies, measured R₁ deviated from model by 8.0% or less.

Discussion: The within-study between-subject CoV incorporates repeatability error and true between-subject variation. Between-study variation also incorporates between-population variation, together with bias from interactions between methodology and physiology. While quantitative relaxometry ultimately requires validation with phantoms and analysis of propagation of errors, this survey allows investigators to compare their own R₁ and variability values with the range of existing literature.

.